Former Inter-Services Intelligence director general Faiz Hameed has filed an appeal against his conviction and sentence by a military court, his lawyer confirmed on Monday.
Hameed’s counsel, Mian Ali Ashfaq, speaking to Dawn News, said an appeal had been submitted. However, he declined to share further details about its contents or grounds.
A military court sentenced Hameed to 14 years of rigorous imprisonment on December 11 after convicting him on four charges. These included violations of secrecy laws, involvement in political activities, misuse of authority, and causing harm to others. Following the verdict, Hameed had 40 days to challenge the decision.
Under Section 133B of the Pakistan Army Act, individuals sentenced to more than three months’ imprisonment by a court-martial may appeal their conviction. These appeals are heard by a court of appeals led by the chief of the army staff. Alternatively, officers designated by him may lead the appeals. The law also allows for a separate review by the federal government under Section 131.
Read: Military Court Sentences Former ISI DG Faiz Hameed to 14 Years Rigorous Imprisonment: ISPR
In addition, legal experts note that constitutional petitions may be filed under Article 199 of the Constitution. These petitions typically raise issues such as jurisdictional flaws or alleged violations of due process during the trial.
Announcing the verdict on December 11, the military’s media wing, Inter-Services Public Relations, said the Field General Court Martial proceedings against Hameed began on August 12, 2024. These proceedings were conducted under the Pakistan Army Act. According to the statement, the process extended for more than 15 months.
ISPR said the court found Hameed guilty on all counts after what it described as extensive legal proceedings. Additionally, the statement noted that allegations concerning his role in promoting political agitation and instability, along with other matters, were being handled separately.
The appeal now moves the case into its next legal phase. Here, higher military authorities and, potentially, civilian courts may examine the conviction and the procedures followed.
