The woman who accused Chris Brown of sexual assault in 2022, identified as Jane Doe, has formally requested a court to dismiss the singer’s $500 million defamation lawsuit against her, filed in response to the Investigation Discovery documentary Chris Brown: A History of Violence.
The documentary, aired in 2025, explores allegations against Brown, prompting the 35-year-old to sue Warner Bros., its producers, and Jane Doe for allegedly portraying him as a “serial rapist and sexual abuser.”
After her sexual assault case was dismissed, the woman suing Chris Brown is now asking the court to toss his lawsuit against her. In Touch has the exclusive details: https://t.co/X6ub5CdUrW.
(📸: Getty) pic.twitter.com/VwfheYaaWp
— In Touch Weekly (@intouchweekly) April 28, 2025Jane Doe’s legal team argues that Brown’s claims lack merit, asserting her actions are protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments as matters of public concern. They contend that Brown’s statements are either substantially true or not materially false and that she has shown no concrete financial harm. Her lawyers also seek to have Brown cover her legal costs. Warner Bros. and the producers echo this defence, arguing Brown, as a public figure, must prove “actual malice,” which they claim he has not.
Read: Chris Brown Faces New Rape Allegations in Recent Documentary
Levi G. McCathern II, Brown’s attorney, alleges that the defendants are promoting a false narrative for profit. This legal dispute originated from Jane Doe’s 2022 lawsuit against Brown, in which she accused him of sexual assault and related charges. However, the court dismissed the case after evidence, including text messages, reportedly undermined her claims. Brown, who has never faced conviction for any sex-related crimes, emphasises this fact in his lawsuit. The case continues to fuel discussions about free speech and defamation boundaries.
