On July 31, 2025, the Provincial Ombudsman of Sindh, Justice (r) Shahnawaz Tariq, ordered the removal of K-Electric CEO Moonis Alvi after he was found guilty of harassing a female employee.
The ruling, issued under the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act, imposed a fine of Rs 2.5 million on Alvi, which must be paid within one month. If he fails to comply, his assets, CNIC, and passport may be frozen.
I have always upheld the values of integrity and dignity in professional interactions, and I deeply believe in fostering safe and inclusive workplaces for all.
The recent verdict is deeply distressing to me. While I respect the legal process and the institutions that
(1/4)
— Moonis Alvi (@alvimoonis) July 31, 2025The ombudsman determined that Alvi harassed the complainant, causing mental distress. This decision comes after a comprehensive investigation, underscoring the significance of workplace safety and accountability according to Pakistan’s anti-harassment laws.
uphold it, I must, in good conscience, state that the findings do not reflect the truth of the situation as I experienced it.
This has been a painful journey — not just professionally, but personally. I am currently reviewing the decision with my legal counsel and will be
(2/4)
— Moonis Alvi (@alvimoonis) July 31, 2025Moonis Alvi’s Response
Alvi described the verdict as “deeply distressing” and claimed that it does not accurately represent his version of events. In his statement, he said, “I respect the legal process, but I must, in good conscience, reject the findings as inaccurate.” He announced his plans to appeal the ruling and remains determined to uncover the truth. Alvi expressed gratitude for the support he has received from colleagues and emphasised his commitment to maintaining dignity in the workplace.
Alvi joined K-Electric in 2008, initially serving as CFO, Company Secretary, and Head of Treasury before becoming CEO in 2018. The K-Electric board reappointed him on July 7, 2025, effective July 30, 2025, just before the ombudsman’s ruling.
