A bomb hidden in an electric scooter killed Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, the chief of Russia’s Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Protection Troops.
General Igor Kirillov was targetted outside an apartment building on Ryazansky Prospekt, a major road leading southeast from the Kremlin, on Tuesday.
Russia’s investigative committee confirmed that someone had strategically placed the explosive device inside an electric scooter parked outside the residential building where General Kirillov and his assistant were located. This calculated attack tragically ended both their lives.
BREAKING: Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of Russia’s chemical and biological defense forces, killed in Moscow blast pic.twitter.com/ENBbMbXACG
— RT (@RT_com) December 17, 2024
Background of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov
Lieutenant General Kirillov was a key figure in the Russian military. He headed the specialized units protecting against nuclear, biological, and chemical threats. His role was crucial, especially considering Russia’s extensive military operations and its focus on enhancing NBC’s defensive capabilities.
Read: Russia Develops “Kalinka” to Counter Starlink and Ukraine’s Defense
The incident has prompted a swift response from Russian authorities, with the investigative committee launching a thorough investigation into the assassination. The killing of such a high-ranking military official underscores the significant tensions within Moscow and raises concerns about internal security measures.
The head of the Russian military's RKhBZ troops Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov and his assistant were both killed in an explosion in Moscow as they left an apartment building. The explosive may have been planted on a scooter parked near the entrance.https://t.co/mCdZUc4leA… pic.twitter.com/0MNHfjGe8g
— Rob Lee (@RALee85) December 17, 2024
The assassination of Lieutenant General Kirillov is not only a profound personal tragedy but also a major security breach that could have wider implications for Russia’s military and defence strategy. It highlights potential vulnerabilities in protecting high-ranking officials and could lead to increased security protocols for military leaders.