Sunday’s national election in Turkey showed preliminary results favoring President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with approximately 47% of the votes accounted for, according to the Turkish state-run news agency. However, these early figures are contested by Erdogan’s primary opposition, Kemal Kilicdaroglu, who claims the numbers misrepresent the actual count.
As per the early count, Erdogan, who has been at the helm of the NATO member state for two decades, holds 52.2% of the vote, while Kilicdaroglu trails with 41.9%, reports the Anadolu Agency. The pre-election polls had suggested a close race, with Erdogan’s growing authoritarian rule causing him to lag slightly behind his opponent.
The election issues primarily revolved around domestic matters such as the economy, civil liberties, and the devastating February earthquake that claimed over 50,000 lives. This seemed to be Erdogan’s most challenging re-election endeavor in his two-decade rule.
However, the early results indicated otherwise, with Kilicdaroglu’s center-left, pro-secular Republican People’s Party, or CHP, questioning the credibility of Anadolu’s figures, alleging a bias towards Erdogan.
Kilicdaroglu, 74, running as the six-party opposition alliance candidate, claimed a lead via Twitter. If he wins, he could potentially unseat Erdogan, 69, promising a democratic revival for Turkey and economic recovery from the current state of high inflation and a depreciating currency. If no candidate secures over 50% of the vote, a run-off will be held on May 28 to determine the winner.
The election also involved choosing representatives for the 600-seat Turkish parliament, which saw its legislative powers diminish under Erdogan’s executive presidency. The opposition has vowed to revert Turkey’s governance to a parliamentary democracy if they secure both the presidential and parliamentary elections.
The election was viewed internationally as a measure of the united opposition’s potential to oust a leader who has consolidated most state powers and is gaining global influence. Erdogan’s administration faced criticism over its alleged slow and inadequate response to the earthquake in the southern provinces and has been accused of exacerbating the crisis through lax enforcement of building codes.
Despite these criticisms, Erdogan utilized state resources and media influence during the election campaign, accusing the opposition of conspiring with “terrorists”, indulging in alcohol, and supporting LGBTQ+ rights, which he perceives as a threat to traditional family values in the predominantly Muslim country.
In contrast, Kilicdaroglu’s six-party Nation Alliance pledged to dismantle the executive presidency system, restore judiciary and central bank independence, and undo crackdowns on free speech and other democratic regressions in Turkey.
Despite the challenges, voters like Necati Aktuna, a voter in Ankara, remain hopeful. “I’ve been voting for the last 60 years. I haven’t seen a more important election than this one,” he said.
Erdogan expressed his optimism that the election would usher a brighter future for Turkey and its democracy. Meanwhile, in the earthquake-hit, Kurdish-majority city of Diyarbakir, voters like Ramazan Akcay hope for a democratic election and a beneficial outcome for their country.
Additional Input from APP
