Significant divisions have emerged within the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa regarding the distribution of Senate election tickets. Party organisers are demanding a ticket for Irfan Saleem from Peshawar and are threatening demonstrations if their request is overlooked.
During a press conference, the leaders labelled the denial as a betrayal of PTI’s ideology, which angered loyal supporters. “Irfan Saleem will remain in the race; his nomination will not be withdrawn under any circumstances,” they declared. This controversy highlights the tensions between grassroots workers and the leadership, with accusations of favouritism towards wealthy individuals.
PTI Peshawar leaders reject ticket changes, back Irfan Saleem’s Senate bid. Warn of KP Assembly protest on July 21, accuse party of favoring ATMs over loyal workers. #IrfanSaleem #PTIPeshawar #SenateElections2025
Read more: https://t.co/qYq4wBGq7c pic.twitter.com/nXQa6Py6lg
— Fourth Pillar Post (@Post4th) July 18, 2025
Organisers insist on awarding the Senate ticket to Irfan Saleem, viewing his exclusion as an ideological violation. They warned of sit-ins outside the Provincial Assembly, the Chief Minister’s House, and the MPAs’ residences if their demands are not met. “No MPA will be allowed to enter the house to cast their vote,” they stated.
They claim 13 to 15 MPs support Saleem and allege efforts to elect candidates unopposed. “If Irfan is denied the ticket, we will launch a movement after the Senate elections,” they added
Workers accuse leadership of sidelining dedicated members for wealthy backers, whom they dub “ATMs.” “Tickets are being handed to ATMs, not workers,” they said. This favouritism betrays Imran Khan’s vision, they argue: “This is an ideological battle that was initiated by PTI founder Imran Khan and we intend to finish it.”
The dispute threatens to disrupt Senate elections and reveal internal divisions. Leadership must address these issues to maintain unity, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where PTI is in power. A failure to do so could lead to protests and weaken party cohesion.