The “hybrid model” for the upcoming ICC Champions Trophy has sparked controversy. Critics argue that it unfairly benefits India by allowing all its matches to be held in one venue.
Scheduled in Pakistan from February 19 to March 9, the event faced issues. The BCCI cited security concerns and refused to send India’s team to Pakistan. Eventually, a compromise allowed India to play in Dubai, including possible semi-finals and finals.
Read: ICC Unveils Champions Trophy 2025 Fixtures and Venues
Former Australian all-rounder Shane Watson called India’s decision not to visit Pakistan “unfortunate.” The new model lets India play entirely in Dubai, unlike other teams who will shuttle between multiple venues in Pakistan and Dubai.
Salim Altaf, a former Pakistan fast bowler, highlighted that India knowing its semi-final venue in advance is a significant advantage. This familiarity with Dubai’s conditions could be advantageous during knockouts.
Meanwhile, rivals like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and New Zealand must adapt to different conditions across the two countries. Former Pakistan captain Intikhab Alam criticized the arrangement, saying, “India avoids travel logistics and enjoys consistent conditions, which is unfair.”
Pakistan will receive a similar arrangement during the 2026 T20 World Cup in Sri Lanka, where all their matches are scheduled.
Alam was surprised other cricket boards did not object to the unfair setup. He also referenced past tournaments where schedules seemed skewed in India’s favour.
The Telegraph’s Tim Wigmore described the situation as unprecedented in sports. He noted it demonstrates India’s significant influence over the cricketing world.
Read: ICC Champions Trophy Stalled Due to India-Pakistan Venue Conflict
Former Pakistan chief selector Mohammad Ilyas saw the arrangement as the only viable solution. Yet, he urged the ICC to enhance bilateral cricket ties between India and Pakistan for the sport’s global benefit.
